1/1/08

Vissi Reveals How Libs Have Supported Our Troops

Let's face it, the libs have been unpatriotic. "Support the troops but not the war"? BS.
The libs have undermined the effort in Iraq at every turn. Exception Lieberman.
They voted twice to authorize sending troops into battle. Why? Politics. They looked weak on national security post 911, and needed to shore up that glaring weakness before the midterm elections.
These two votes were nothing more than political votes.
How can you trust a party votes to authorize force because it might win some votes?
How can you trust a party that wants to run away-surrender when things get tough?
Not only flees, but undermines the effort and submarines our troops?

Vissi sets a lib straight:

vissi d artemaria
http://wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=462641&page=2
Post #30

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryrose
That has to be one of the most UnAmerican things I've heard lately.

Who inhabitsYOUR country?

All those names on the Vietnam Memorial...you think they were all Republicans and Libertarians who died for this country?

Have you served in a WAR?

I notice you criticize Vets of Foreign Wars.

George Bush had the opportunity...AND didn't.

Not because he didn't support the War ...
or because he believed no Americans should be facing death over there...

But because...HE didn't want to.

Commander in Chief...he didn't want to die for any Americans.

Look at the Dem records on Vet spending and Military Pay and benefits...as well as MIlitary equipment spending and assuring more time between tours...

Then look at the republican votes on those issues.

Supporting troops goes further than putting a yellow ribbon on your truck...and wearing a flag on your worsted wool lapel...and voting GOP..

Those are the easy ways to appear to be supporting our soldiers...while actually paying Blackwater and Halliburton the mega-cash that OUR OWN troops and Vets need desperatley.

George Bush and the Congressmen who rubberstamp his every -"NO"-support the troops...how?

Liberals trashed and spit on our Viet Nam military personnel and you have the audacity to feign reverance over the names on the Wall in the name of liberal high ground? Christ.

Supporting troops goes farther than posting about what a great job the same schmucks that crapped all over the US military during Viet Nam are doing now to 'take care' of them, and wearing 'Impeach Bush' buttons.


12/31/07

A Moment of Sanity to End the Year

Hal should post more often. I understand why he doesn't.

From the thread George "Doesn't Play Well With Others", comes one of those rare moments of lucidity, brevity, and sanity:
Hiya guys,

Can a conservative patriot get into this little discussion? We conservatives are the silent majority, but we tend to speak up when certain issues are overlooked and the country (as in the media) gets carried a little too far to the left.

Yes, you are right in saying that the war in Iraq has gone a little sour. But that's the way of all conflicts when your are dealing with different ideologies. If Roosevelt had listened to all of his opponents, we would probably be doing the goose step in New York City. If Lincoln hadn't taken the leadership of the Union army away from George B. McClellan and given it to Grant, we would probably have two or three different countries between Canada and Mexico.

There have been different opinions in every conflict since Cain slew his brother Abel but I try to concentrate on right and wrong rather than right and left. It was wrong for a family to rule a country by slaughtering their people, it was wrong for that same family to threaten their neighbors with wars, it was wrong for a whole country to live in fear from this same evil family, fear of rape and death ruled this country where we are trying to replace it with freedom and a Democracy. All one has to do is check out the mass graveyards in Iraq to decide who were the victims. If the world had stood up to the troublemakers before the second World War started, maybe there would have been 57 million lives saved. How many Mozarts, Einsteins, Michaelangelos and just plain nice people were snuffed out before their God given tasks and lives had been fullfilled.

The American President's most important job is to see that the American people can live in peace and harmony and to do that he must prevent any foriegn intrusion into that arena. We were attacked in 2001 which started this whole mess. Lets remember try to put the blame where it belongs and try not to criticize those elected officials who are trying to do their job. Peace at any cost doesn't work with terrorists who's aim in life is to kill you.

CreativeHal
http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393696
Post #11

12/30/07

Bush WANTS Nukes (yada yada yada)

I love the title of the thread...Bush wants Nukes
Reveals a certain mentality.
The same mentality expressed by the wacko's when Reagan was president.

The Times reported that a copy of the report was obtained by defense analyst and Times contributor William Arkin.


I love the following even more.

Clue bell, folks. The U.S. has always had contigency plans for using nukes. This should not be newsworthy. It is only newsworthy because of some some far left-wing liberal journalist looking to stir the pot.

Contingency plans for nuclear weapons does not equate to a desire to use them. Shame on Mr. Arkin, and others involved in this.

Scottb

With the Wet Diapers, Republicans = "trolls" and "stalkers".

txrembrandt
http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=464600&page=3
Post #31

When I first came on here I figured that most on here, being artists would lean toward the liberal side and be fun to chat with but I soon found out that the trolls and Bush lovers were stalking about. I was a little upset with this delimma...

The bit about being upset there is an actual opposition in a "Debates" form?
PS. That is why it's called "Debates".

PS. Dilemma.

12/29/07

The Lone Ranger(s) TROLL ALERT!!!

When I was at Art School, there was one conservative artist, who had to keep his politics to himself because if he said anything against the majority he was ridiculed and attacked.

Tina D
http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393696&page=2

Post #16

The only difference between Tina's art school and Wet Diaper's Debates is some conservatives do take on the swarm of venomous Hardcore Libs. Some are labeled "trolls", others simply banned for poking fun at the opposition.

One small victory: Most libs have had the "troll" card schooled out of them. No longer can they throw that card around in an attempt to change the subject or dislodge a conservative artist... because they know it will be used to illustrate their intolerance.

Isn't it odd (LOL :o), never has there been a liberal "troll" in Wettie World.

12/28/07

"Balance" in Wettie World


I've always seen Fox as 'balanced' toward the Christian fundamentalist right ... that's why I rarely watch it. I have nothing against Christians, being one myself, but I want as 'fair and balanced' as possible... I'd love it if I could get BBC to balance off CNN...

Dianne Cutter
Moderator
www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=390235
Post #3

LOL :o
Getting the BBC to "balance off" CNN in like getting Pol Pot to "balance off" Stalin.

With moderator like those posted, is it any wonder I kept getting banned?
LOL :o

12/27/07

Hang Saddam?

Responses are no surprise, but some just beg you to say... Please... don't toke and post.

Edited for brevity.
Maryrose
Post #11
...Saddam is just a scapegoat; a cover up for the real reason the US is in Iraq. The Oil is the only reason.


Spectacle of Nothing
Post #15
given the meathods and criteria for hanging Sadaam.. Bush should also be hung.


Darabos
Post #34
i oppose the death penalty.
but when you really think about it, if he wasnt the hardass he was, the region woulda went to complete **** much sooner.


Bliss
Post #41
The US had no business starting this problem.


Musket
Moderator
Post #47
Thus endeth the Bush family's personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein,


For more deep thought on the subject (LOL :o), visit the thread at: http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=390787

12/23/07

Wetcanvas Libs Defend Sexual Predators

Raven schools a few clueless libs...
...and txrembrandt reveals the deep liberal thought process.

So...
Will Raven's education have an effect?
Will they learn anything?
LOL :o. C'mon folks, these are libs.

If you read the entire thread (have a bucket handy) you'll see libs can justify anything.
Defenders of women's right?
Upholders of law?
Moral compass?
Clear thinking?
Ahhhh...No.
#175

TheRaven

Re: 22 Ways To Be A Liberal Democrat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smileawhyl
I don't know how much Paula Jones appreciated the nose job. I also found a nude picture of her, pre-clintonization (as evidenced by the puffy hairstyle). I'd say the poor poor girl was caught off guard, but she was looking — oh so directly and smiling — straight into the camera lense. hmmmmmm

And it doesn't take 3 years to save enough money to go after someone for breaking the law. That's why tax dollars pay the police.
This is blaming the victim. Women who get abused, assaulted, attempted rape or raped have responses that include keeping quiet until they get enough support. Some women wait years. They also act out sexually following being treated like trash.
Anyone who deplores sexual abuses like this should feel shame for blaming the victim only b/c the victim pointed at a political figure they support. Shame and embaressment for the hypocrisy of selling out a abuse victim.
#177
Old
txrembrandt


Hails from United States
Re: 22 Ways To Be A Liberal Democrat

It wouldn't surprise me one bit if Monica wasn't hired and paid off by the GOP. They aren't beyond doing somthing like that. They are doing it daily now!
#178


Smileawhyl



Hails from United States
Re: 22 Ways To Be A Liberal Democrat

Quote:
Originally Posted by txrembrandt
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if Monica wasn't hired and paid off by the GOP. They aren't beyond doing somthing like that. They are doing it daily now!
Monica did nto want to participate in the witch hunt at all. It was Linda "nose job" Tripp, pretending to be her friend, recording her, lying to her, which pulled her into it.
txrembrandt
Hails from United States
Re: 22 Ways To Be A Liberal Democrat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smileawhyl
Monica did nto want to participate in the witch hunt at all. It was Linda "nose job" Tripp, pretending to be her friend, recording her, lying to her, which pulled her into it.

Yes, I remember that now.
FINI

Yeah, you really have to hate them liars.
http://www.rightwingnews.com/quotes/clinton.php

12/22/07

Lily Katz (soon Flat Katz) gets Wettie Debates Forum Moderator Musket (Lib-NH) to reveal his refined debating skills

To be a conservative, you have to believe that nobody else ever cut and pasted this dreck into a thread in this forum before you did.
Musket (Lib-NH), Site Moderator
Lily, you know you scored a bullseye when the MODERATORS are flaming you.
Better watch it, just in case they think you're zimmer. LOL :o
After all, you only have 64 posts.
That's VERY thin ice.
Believe me, I know.
Should build up a couple hundred before skating on deep waters.

Lily, your post (listed below) makes a ton of logical points, and has fun doing so at the same time, but that's not where the libs brains are.
Logic... NO.
Emotion...YES.
Hence the response from the FORUM MODERATOR.
And how dare you identify and make fun of Libs all in one go!
Watch out for the tires.
LOL :o

From Lily Katz's thread starting post:
22 Ways To Be a Liberal Democrat.
http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=464794
1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.
... see Wettie World link above for the remainder...

12/21/07

You Have Been Banned! Not!!

Banned, and unbanned in all of three minutes.
Notice the time in the lower right corner.
Yes, I was Box of rain. Just an 'ol Dead Head.
Photobucket

Photobucket
Where have I seen that before? Hmmmmmmmmm?

Photobucket
Never has never been so short.

And now?
LOL.